Insights
BSKB’s intellectual property attorneys write articles on important and timely topics in intellectual property law across a variety of industries. You’ll find the latest articles and industry insights here.
-
January 8, 2013
Consumer Reviews May be Protected by Anti-SLAPP Laws
Inside Counsel
Anti-SLAPP laws should serve to further give a potential plaintiff pause when considering a civil action for negative online reviews and comments
-
December 25, 2012
Having Facebook Fans Doesn’t Count as Business Expectancy
Inside Counsel
Facebook can take down your company’s page if another party complains of infringement
-
November 27, 2012
Effective Terms of Use Agreements
Inside Counsel
-
October 30, 2020
3D Printing and Patent Law
Many people have access to a 3D printer. Thus, conceivably, a person could illegally print (make) a patented object using a 3D printer. Let’s consider the following real life scenario that occurred in Italy during the peak of the coronavirus epidemic in the Spring of 2020.
-
May 29, 2020
Double Patenting: Expiry Dates Hold the Key
LSIPR
The April 22, 2014 decision in Gilead Sciences, Inc v Natco Pharma Inc (Gilead) emphasises that obviousness-type double patenting (ODP) is a concern not just during the examination of a patent before the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) but is a viable basis for invalidating an issued patent despite the presumption of validity that a patent has under 35 USC §282. In the case, Gilead owned two patents: the ‘483 and the ‘375. After being sued for infringement of the ‘483 patent, Natco asserted that the claims of the ‘483 patent were invalid for ODP as being obvious given the claims of the ‘375 patent.